Mykola M. Yakubovskiy, Myroslava O. Soldak, 78_01
Wednesday, 14 June 2017 03:29 | Author: Покотиленко Р.В. | 
Mykola M. Yakubovskiy
Doctor of Economics, professor, The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine.
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Myroslava O. Soldak
PhD in Economics, The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine.
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Choosing structural accents of ukraine’s industry development activization
Section: Problems of development strategy and financial-economic regulation of industry
Ekon. promisl. 2017, 78(2): 5-21
https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2017.02.005
Language: Russian
| Full text (PDF)
| References:
1.Kondrat'ev, M.D. (2002). Big cycles of conjuncture and theory of foresight: selectas. M, Ekonomika [in Russian].
2.Shumpeter, Yozef A. (2004). Theory of Economic Analysis: In 3 Vol. In V.S. Avtonomova (Ed). S-Pb, Economic School [in Russian].
3.Kuznets, S. (1969). Model Economik Growth. Yale University Press.
4.UNIDO (2013). Lima Declaration: Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Lima, Peru. Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media_upgrade/Who_we_are/Structure/Policymaking_Organs/Lima_Declaration_RU_web.pdf [in Russian].
5.UNIDO (2016). Industrial Development Report 2016: The role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Retrieved from: https://www. unido.org/fileadmin/use. IDR2016_FULLREPORT.pdf
6.Zveryakov, M. (2016). Industrial policy and a mechanism of its realization. Economy of Ukraine, 6, 3-18 [in Russian].
7.Vishnevskii, V. (2016). Global neoindustrialization and its lessons for Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 8, 26-43 [in Russian].
8.Zbarazska, L. (2016). Neoindustrialization in Ukraine: concept of national model. Ekon. promіsl., 3(75), 5-32 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: 10.15407/econindustry2016.03.005.
9.Amosha, O.I., Vishnevsky, V.P., Zbarazska, L.O. and oths. (2014). Industry and industrial policy of Ukraine 2013: cur-rent trends, challenges, opportunities: Scientific and Analytical Report. In V.P. Vish-nevsky (Ed.). Donetsk, Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
10.Sobkevych, O., Sukhorukov, A., Shevchenko, A. and oths. (2014). Innovative development industry as part of the struc-tural transformation of the economy of Ukraine: Analytical Report. In Ya. Zhalilo (Ed.). Kyiv, Institute of economics and forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
11.Kindzersky, Yu.V. (2013). Industry of Ukraine: strategy and policy of structural and technological modernization. Kyiv: Institute for economics and forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
12.Lyashenko, V., & Kotov, Ye. (2015). Ukraine XXI: neoindustrialna state or "crash of the project"? Kyiv: Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
13.Kalynyn, A. (2012). Building a Balanced Industrial Policy: Issues of Structuring Goals, Tasks and Tools. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 4, 132-146 [in Russian].
14.Druker, Piter F. (2007). The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. Moskva [in Russian].
15.Kondrat'ev, V. (2006). State and corporations in the global competitiveness strategy Mezhdunarodnye processy. 3. Available from: http://www.intertrends.ru/twelfth/002.htm [assessed 20 Desember 2016] [in Russian].
16.Drebencov, V. (2004). Theory and reality. Liberal Economics and Economic unfreedom. Mezhdunarodnye processy. 3. Retrieved from: http://www.intertrends.ru/ sixth/002.htm [in Russian].
17.Kindzersky, Yu.V., Yakubovsky, M.M., Galitsa, I.A. and oths. (2009). The potential of the national industry: the goals and mechanisms of effective development. In Yu.V. Kindzersky (Ed.). Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Doctor of Economics, professor, The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine.
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Myroslava O. Soldak
PhD in Economics, The Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine.
Address: 03057, Ukraine, Kyiv, 2 Gelabov Str.
E-mail: E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Choosing structural accents of ukraine’s industry development activization
Section: Problems of development strategy and financial-economic regulation of industry
Ekon. promisl. 2017, 78(2): 5-21
https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2017.02.005
Language: Russian
Abstract:
The search for the sectoral vector of structural policies is still urgent for Ukrainian industry. Each of the sectors bears the relevant economic and social burden and therefore has a reason to claim the state support. To some extent such support exists. However, it is provided not according to the strategy of socio-economic development of the country, which would give it the economic and legal framework, but by lobbying the private interests of certain business groups. Further conservation of this trend can only deepen the conflict of interests of the society and business, and as a result slow the process of modernization and revitalization of the industry.
State policy strategy on supporting certain sectors and industries should be open and scientifically grounded. The support should be based on the sectors able to provide further structural transformation of the industrial complex, in particular improving the technological level, overcoming the raw material orientation, and deepening technological processing with an increase in value added. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to develop new approaches to the identification of priority industrial activities, the results of which will help to manage the process of changes in the structure of production directed to the creation of a modern industrial complex able to raise the country’s competitiveness and provide the achievement of sustainable economic growth. To choose these sectors, the following criteria are offered: efficiency, i.e., a share of GDP that the industrial sector generates per hryvnia; manufacturing activity, namely, how rapidly the industry develops due to competitive conditions and the demand for its products; market position, in particular export orientation and import dependence of the industry in providing domestic market requirements; innovativeness, i.e., how the development of the activity will contribute to the modernization of the domestic industry in accordance with global trends.
The methodology of the integral measurement of priority activities is based on the scoring for each of the criteria adopted and their total value. The rating estimation of the priority of certain industrial activities for providing the state support is the result of the study. The proposed approach to the definition of priority will allow managing the process of structural changes and assessing the potential effect of the industrial policy on improving the industrial structure.
Keywords: industry, structural policy, industrial sectors, rating estimation.
JEL: O140, O250.
The search for the sectoral vector of structural policies is still urgent for Ukrainian industry. Each of the sectors bears the relevant economic and social burden and therefore has a reason to claim the state support. To some extent such support exists. However, it is provided not according to the strategy of socio-economic development of the country, which would give it the economic and legal framework, but by lobbying the private interests of certain business groups. Further conservation of this trend can only deepen the conflict of interests of the society and business, and as a result slow the process of modernization and revitalization of the industry.
State policy strategy on supporting certain sectors and industries should be open and scientifically grounded. The support should be based on the sectors able to provide further structural transformation of the industrial complex, in particular improving the technological level, overcoming the raw material orientation, and deepening technological processing with an increase in value added. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to develop new approaches to the identification of priority industrial activities, the results of which will help to manage the process of changes in the structure of production directed to the creation of a modern industrial complex able to raise the country’s competitiveness and provide the achievement of sustainable economic growth. To choose these sectors, the following criteria are offered: efficiency, i.e., a share of GDP that the industrial sector generates per hryvnia; manufacturing activity, namely, how rapidly the industry develops due to competitive conditions and the demand for its products; market position, in particular export orientation and import dependence of the industry in providing domestic market requirements; innovativeness, i.e., how the development of the activity will contribute to the modernization of the domestic industry in accordance with global trends.
The methodology of the integral measurement of priority activities is based on the scoring for each of the criteria adopted and their total value. The rating estimation of the priority of certain industrial activities for providing the state support is the result of the study. The proposed approach to the definition of priority will allow managing the process of structural changes and assessing the potential effect of the industrial policy on improving the industrial structure.
Keywords: industry, structural policy, industrial sectors, rating estimation.
JEL: O140, O250.
| Full text (PDF)
| References:
1.Kondrat'ev, M.D. (2002). Big cycles of conjuncture and theory of foresight: selectas. M, Ekonomika [in Russian].
2.Shumpeter, Yozef A. (2004). Theory of Economic Analysis: In 3 Vol. In V.S. Avtonomova (Ed). S-Pb, Economic School [in Russian].
3.Kuznets, S. (1969). Model Economik Growth. Yale University Press.
4.UNIDO (2013). Lima Declaration: Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Lima, Peru. Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media_upgrade/Who_we_are/Structure/Policymaking_Organs/Lima_Declaration_RU_web.pdf [in Russian].
5.UNIDO (2016). Industrial Development Report 2016: The role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Retrieved from: https://www. unido.org/fileadmin/use. IDR2016_FULLREPORT.pdf
6.Zveryakov, M. (2016). Industrial policy and a mechanism of its realization. Economy of Ukraine, 6, 3-18 [in Russian].
7.Vishnevskii, V. (2016). Global neoindustrialization and its lessons for Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 8, 26-43 [in Russian].
8.Zbarazska, L. (2016). Neoindustrialization in Ukraine: concept of national model. Ekon. promіsl., 3(75), 5-32 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: 10.15407/econindustry2016.03.005.
9.Amosha, O.I., Vishnevsky, V.P., Zbarazska, L.O. and oths. (2014). Industry and industrial policy of Ukraine 2013: cur-rent trends, challenges, opportunities: Scientific and Analytical Report. In V.P. Vish-nevsky (Ed.). Donetsk, Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
10.Sobkevych, O., Sukhorukov, A., Shevchenko, A. and oths. (2014). Innovative development industry as part of the struc-tural transformation of the economy of Ukraine: Analytical Report. In Ya. Zhalilo (Ed.). Kyiv, Institute of economics and forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
11.Kindzersky, Yu.V. (2013). Industry of Ukraine: strategy and policy of structural and technological modernization. Kyiv: Institute for economics and forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
12.Lyashenko, V., & Kotov, Ye. (2015). Ukraine XXI: neoindustrialna state or "crash of the project"? Kyiv: Institute of the Economy of Industry of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
13.Kalynyn, A. (2012). Building a Balanced Industrial Policy: Issues of Structuring Goals, Tasks and Tools. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 4, 132-146 [in Russian].
14.Druker, Piter F. (2007). The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. Moskva [in Russian].
15.Kondrat'ev, V. (2006). State and corporations in the global competitiveness strategy Mezhdunarodnye processy. 3. Available from: http://www.intertrends.ru/twelfth/002.htm [assessed 20 Desember 2016] [in Russian].
16.Drebencov, V. (2004). Theory and reality. Liberal Economics and Economic unfreedom. Mezhdunarodnye processy. 3. Retrieved from: http://www.intertrends.ru/ sixth/002.htm [in Russian].
17.Kindzersky, Yu.V., Yakubovsky, M.M., Galitsa, I.A. and oths. (2009). The potential of the national industry: the goals and mechanisms of effective development. In Yu.V. Kindzersky (Ed.). Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
